From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222F41F8C4; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 22:14:28 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Julien Moutinho Cc: meta@public-inbox.org, Dominique Martinet Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/lei-sigpipe.t: ensure SIGPIPE is not ignored instead of not blocked Message-ID: <20220314221428.M538566@dcvr> References: <20220227111714.GA13350@dcvr> <20220311104233.2408081-1-julm+public-inbox@sourcephile.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220311104233.2408081-1-julm+public-inbox@sourcephile.fr> List-Id: Julien Moutinho wrote: > Ignoring a signal is different than blocking a signal. Thanks, pushed as commit f1e4e14793d155ea7d6ed7a6858b668e97c7e5d8 I wasn't sure why this patch was necessary at first. Thus I took take a closer look at systemd behavior to confirm, and updated the message: Ignoring a signal is different than blocking a signal, and the "IgnoreSIGPIPE" option of systemd ignores. [ew: note systemd behavior] Acked-by: Eric Wong I (and any other project maintainer) would appreciate more complete explanations in the future as to why a patch is needed. Thanks again.