From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: Julien Moutinho <julm+public-inbox@sourcephile.fr>,
meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nodatacow: quiet chattr errors [was: Test failures with 1.7.0]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 02:03:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220131020311.M540193@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfcc0C8ODrag1eik@codewreck.org>
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote on Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:49:08PM +0000:
> > Thanks for testing the previous patch. Actually, I prefer we
> > drop previous implementations and instead rely on Linux ABI
> > stability while shifting maintenance burden to maintainers.
>
> This makes sense.
>
> > Can you test the patch below? It supercedes the other one.
>
> I've tested the patch with a btrfs test directory and this test:
> BTRFS_TESTDIR=... prove -bvw t/nodatacow.t
>
> after adding the local git repo to PERL5LIBs
>
> With a BTRFS dir as BTRFS it all works, the ioctl are passed and files
> are indeed nocow (checked with lsattr afterwards as files aren't
> deleted)
>
> With a tmpfs instead the tests fail as it tried to call the ioctl
> anyway -- I didn't take the time to check if thest mtab parsing was
> removed, is the ioctl tried anyway or does setting the environment
> variable skip this part?
> If so then it's probably fine.
>
> (the failure is as below:
> ------
> $ BTRFS_TESTDIR=/tmp/test strace -o /tmp/strace -f prove -bvw t/nodatacow.t
> t/nodatacow.t ..
> ok 1 - use PublicInbox::Syscall;
> /run/current-system/sw/bin/lsattr: Operation not supported While reading flags on /tmp/test/nodatacow-rfqh/pp.f
> not ok 2 - `C' attribute set on fd with pure Perl
>
> # Failed test '`C' attribute set on fd with pure Perl'
> # at t/nodatacow.t line 31.
> # ''
> # doesn't match '(?^:C.*\/tmp\/test\/nodatacow\-rfqh\/pp\.f)'
> /run/current-system/sw/bin/lsattr: Operation not supported While reading flags on /tmp/test/nodatacow-rfqh/pp.d
Ah, intentionally setting BTRFS_TESTDIR to something that isn't
btrfs will break, yes. I suppose an explicit BAIL_OUT is in order, here:
diff --git a/t/nodatacow.t b/t/nodatacow.t
index 83aa227f..0940d908 100644
--- a/t/nodatacow.t
+++ b/t/nodatacow.t
@@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ SKIP: {
open my $fh, '>', $name or BAIL_OUT "open($name): $!";
PublicInbox::Syscall::nodatacow_fh($fh);
my $res = xqx([$lsattr, $name]);
- like($res, qr/C.*\Q$name\E/, "`C' attribute set on fd with pure Perl");
+ BAIL_OUT "lsattr(1) fails in $dir" if $?;
+ like($res, qr/C.*\Q$name\E/, "`C' attribute set on fd with pure Perl");
$name = "$dn/pp.d";
mkdir($name) or BAIL_OUT "mkdir($name) $!";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 1:07 Test failures with 1.7.0 Julien Moutinho
2021-12-08 4:08 ` Eric Wong
2021-12-08 10:56 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-12-08 18:22 ` [PATCH] nodatacow: quiet chattr errors [was: Test failures with 1.7.0] Eric Wong
2021-12-08 21:14 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-12-08 22:01 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-01-30 21:49 ` Eric Wong
2022-01-30 23:18 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-01-31 2:03 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2022-01-31 3:34 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-01 1:27 ` Eric Wong
2021-12-09 1:37 ` Test failures with 1.7.0 Julien Moutinho
2021-12-09 2:53 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-01 9:37 ` Eric Wong
2022-02-01 23:27 ` FD_CLOEXEC w/ nix-shell [was: Test failures with 1.7.0] Eric Wong
2022-02-02 0:23 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-02 2:11 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-01 23:34 ` [PATCH] test_lei: use consistent locale for error messages Eric Wong
2022-02-17 21:02 ` [PATCH] t/lei-sigpipe: attempt to improve diagnostics for stuck test Eric Wong
2022-02-20 1:38 ` Julien Moutinho
2022-02-22 6:44 ` Eric Wong
2022-02-27 4:15 ` Julien Moutinho
2022-02-27 6:41 ` Julien Moutinho
2022-02-27 7:23 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-27 8:04 ` Julien Moutinho
2022-02-27 11:17 ` [PATCH] t/lei-sigpipe: ensure SIGPIPE is unblocked for this test Eric Wong
2022-03-11 10:42 ` [PATCH] t/lei-sigpipe.t: ensure SIGPIPE is not ignored instead of not blocked Julien Moutinho
2022-03-14 22:14 ` Eric Wong
2022-03-15 2:56 ` Julien Moutinho
2022-03-01 2:30 ` Test failures with 1.7.0 Julien Moutinho
2022-03-01 4:05 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://public-inbox.org/README
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220131020311.M540193@dcvr \
--to=e@80x24.org \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=julm+public-inbox@sourcephile.fr \
--cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).