From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS51083 80.67.180.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mermet.sourcephile.fr (revolt129.abo.ilico.org [80.67.180.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667A71F953 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 01:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 02:07:30 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourcephile.fr; s=20200101; t=1638925650; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=0r5MjfpaEJtWv5jMa+bPfAsvHTyy4vlP+HVXoAwkjvg=; b=lQACqa+wYk6B5f5LJySJaUZwR0mxmOo5kdMRJU7L5UKdUnq8S86jlPgCw7v1uosIXBXyEg 0aqFxjg3uR3R9mG+s4mS2SmjIFOtzMlt7jgbOn8eMpG6spMShc0cHH1ewz7xV1PMf84YGt pRe0iOij4dc59TGgZZCAv1yI3eI8fF6KaX1QoQMjirbRI5Hp1RwDvFucN0Bs4Xuw/QRvuN cUYsjNdD7vxNgGdJ+je1LV+0VnN3NRFjYChCd3EfTxt0kOAbCbs3uq95UwU6/H5Z0POdea yJ8bDRVHKTKw2vL4mYr73dmEMU73oeK/ef7jElCUk+hEL5lRDG8F7XN3uAs+i395LdL780 62ZBhv1BllQRupgbhjLXddPzv6IG42F+vh7Q+G7pmRoEfrpyBmja5NEsz+TU+K/L5GqhTs A0RGyw5I7e1xKlUZxyZOdh9dYLvQk6objW/L5Rw9Mil5xCWkwtuWWNE7Qj4gRpOa0l0JHe o76QvueUcRHFg1jpGdHI/O2t5vpzIESp1rM3m9oHmOnBIZd5prLjmDpJwx7nNytjNU8tG8 bcc9zyXUii1UArC+PFLJsVGoAytzQwzjIDzEoNMWOCgUiAQuBEJXiB4c2of0QBAkE9WvB6 wXa788RTdewLYbZCE+8Ph/8LRs664ZrOLjDFnKUy33cWMkDfxUjDQ= From: Julien Moutinho To: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Test failures with 1.7.0 Message-ID: <20211208010730.f47xxgzj53nwgvja@sourcephile.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Hi! I'm trying to package the new 1.7.0 public-inbox into NixOS at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/104457 but two reviewers are facing different test failures that I cannot reproduce: One reviewer and a bot fail with: > t/lei_to_mail.t .............. 1/? Use of uninitialized value in open at t/lei_to_mail.t line 263. > Bailout called. Further testing stopped: No such file or directory > FAILED--Further testing stopped: No such file or directory And another reviewer fails 3 times with: > t/extsearch.t (Wstat: 2048 Tests: 145 Failed: 8) > Failed tests: 68-69, 75-76, 86, 98, 102, 139 > Non-zero exit status: 8 > t/imapd.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 186 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 183 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > t/nntpd.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 110 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 104 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Files=149, Tests=4730, 107 wallclock secs ( 1.14 usr 0.21 sys + 50.13 cusr 54.98 csys = 106.46 CPU) > Result: FAIL > Failed 3/149 test programs. 10/4730 subtests failed. Nix being Nix we can assume the exact same code is used for all, but our systems are different (eg. CPU(s), filesystem(s), etc.) Could you provide some help? Thanks