From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4371F8C7 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 21:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id h27so12637908qtu.9 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2JZZputJyoMd511GjizC13K5pAR3SBzOSOTgcw/hi2o=; b=cK0+h9gz+xVNxNIe3AI6SQAMwiUkS9uz+j5Cw9+jkeg6PphGlaCLw15oaNiSln1jNo KinUS1ZU1FRJb8MAXx2Z8WTO+NXOITPkJh6Q64YUETKBhsVp7+OvQrnVdQTEkSf29GVz cg34dJDDe8MWvEMnytAX1hBTlO93ENODkDYWk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2JZZputJyoMd511GjizC13K5pAR3SBzOSOTgcw/hi2o=; b=ZckSMDjBhxlk6XAWh3Nkr/ada48uYVMifmlFQVXnseMq1m4SADzUCv++/SXtIJ/hb2 YLcMwUPVXBChtxSssPg+3q5kew9j0I164TeRnWcj5omdD0TmU9CNJ3zCqvR8dJI33Pwd Gj5ZpHtp5/yWnfJ8Tnjzv0DepoaSueJNDLC4X6J10WjK+eJcWDq++ogmXjSnMS+r7rF+ 4Zq70Gtqo/Y+a38jO9P745PtbNiHs1jIix6j07kwK7CbuheEyvKXxHAlQlAcIFNFCtek 4vmcD4POlO5yJFEatwr6NVr/BfDk7oYMgPYilhNp3s4qh4lTJtaUPzbiQrJO3y5f5v/1 uimg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530X4KpZ6mykqfyMOz8/KA1Jhh84hQuaVYcyYOPxSmkWAiE8UmQm xcFErgEvwR5nxiQqmPIp0ojnrxQGZrr0F+y6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0L9KsfS9+5SVgJjxYF+2eLA03qvPBxDHbqBB6skOC8AX5Ja6VTFBuF9LsigJZOjfoYTaS2w== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7769:: with SMTP id h9mr15648392qtu.388.1627939765107; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nitro.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm5181025qtb.61.2021.08.02.14.29.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:29:23 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: boost and /all/ Message-ID: <20210802212923.3hnishr2xeuqhgpk@nitro.local> References: <20210802204058.vscbxs5q7xyolyu2@nitro.local> <20210802211656.GA28706@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210802211656.GA28706@dcvr> List-Id: On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 09:16:56PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > I believe this should assign boost value of 0, but the virtualization source > > seems to be "winning" both via the interface and when retrieving t.mbox.gz. > > Anything I'm not doing right? > > Correct, boost=0 is the default. Did you set boost before indexing? > It needs to be set before indexing (or reindexing). Yes, all boost values were present from the start. On this particular instance, I ended up indexing a few tiny lists first, and then /lkml/, and only after that the remaining bulk of repositories, so this thread would have first made its way in through /lkml/ and then through most other lists, including /virtualization/. That shouldn't have caused /virtualization/ to "win", should it? -K