From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EFE1F9FD; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:16:55 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: release timelines (-extindex, JMAP, lei) Message-ID: <20210308221655.GA30745@dcvr> References: <20210305222019.GB1010@dcvr> <20210308213332.w3aoum7nnsri5zh3@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210308213332.w3aoum7nnsri5zh3@chatter.i7.local> List-Id: Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 10:20:19PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > * lei saved searches can probably done quick for 1.7, > > but without full keywords support for externals... > > I was wondering if lei should be part of the same suite as public-inbox proper > as opposed to a standalone (or interdependent) client tool. Unless I'm > mistaken, someone running a public-inbox origin or mirror server wouldn't > necessarily be an active lei user. Decoupling them from each-other would allow > different release cadence, no? I've considered it, yes, but there's a lot of shared code and writing release notes/planning/packaging for one project is challenging enough. As one might imagine, the non-coding aspects of the project are the least interesting to me so I try to avoid it as much as possible. And I'm planning on sharing more code based on the work I've done so far around IPC, too. > > In any case, I need to take a few days away to clear my head. > > Please take care! > > Thanks for your effort on this project. You're welcome. Should be back to coding in a day or so, still dealing with leaks of the non-memory variety :x