From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6310D1F8C4; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 09:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 09:01:19 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Kyle Meyer Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: lei-q doc thoughts... [was: doc: start manpages for lei commands] Message-ID: <20210206090119.GA14519@dcvr> References: <20210201055704.26683-1-kyle@kyleam.com> <20210201055704.26683-2-kyle@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210201055704.26683-2-kyle@kyleam.com> List-Id: Kyle Meyer wrote: > +=item --mua-cmd=COMMAND, --mua=COMMAND On second thought: is the long "--mua-cmd" even worth having or supporting given "--mua=" exists? I will likely remove it from the documentation and filter it out from the help text. Technically "mua-cmd" is more descriptive since it's a command with a %f placeholder, but I can't imagine anybody wanting to type "--mua-cmd" over "--mua". > +=item -t, --thread > + > +Return all messages in the same thread as the actual match(es). Heh, it turns out mairix uses "--threads" (plural). I never knew that since I always used "-t". Not sure if it's worth pluralizing on our end...