From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11691F4B4;
	Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:56:26 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:56:26 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: SOCK_SEQPACKET portability for AF_UNIX?
Message-ID: <20210112035626.GA15703@dcvr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Any concerns about the portability of SOCK_SEQPACKET for
AF_UNIX (aka AF_LOCAL) sockets?

I know Linux has had it for ages, and FreeBSD 9+, too, I
think... (FreeBSD 11.x+ definitely does)

I've been using them for many years in less-popular projects
and (AFAIK) those projects only have Linux users.