From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F7E1F4B4 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id p5so6489857qvs.7 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:50:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+cbPq8wvFUT41cuguSgb8EvUGptJQK9QqxxELT42/w8=; b=OvEiAKuPZYObeFla9VD2hDqRrlXILSm2YOoT9fod6szaENxsC36Td8392R/THNNFRk BeqJDfcVAK/Nb74AKoLIu92qoaTS6dcirlYU6hxld+rkMACuHVnuEwSfxUwl+USgUBnb QNrKrYffbUyd3UuIUHl3FBvDenO123q0xGi+I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=+cbPq8wvFUT41cuguSgb8EvUGptJQK9QqxxELT42/w8=; b=gleLT+Az6d/td+p9SFUQDJYpfQ2WPg5UYfnoBuMyIJ5okeLI82UU8xpRnz3Nxwc1i8 cFKs746UGvcR5BFOrDFWJl/h1+oIvtIiZM3iq7Rar/gr4Je7afnBL1LtBtfGk48rLUv5 kPfsvCbBb3WvvsUsPFbJ94FrE9j70qGexw4ugarmAa3GlmufQGN7/OZOO3pEAPMWWV5A mfvaNKyUI4M6C8Hzfnocnw+/zQJiFOYBmD71GBTgH/JPlA0IKKjKXAaxfSUkayN1H7oa XdLgtXKcDc1Jcd6c0Hy4Q7+WOensfgDOgu603RMhsWAtNXzMzze6XwpdXe9IGo+gdgkh 9FQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VXZx3eMXp4Oc9yB6o0zJUvtssa1jgwuwag/6Xp5UKv26dOU32 AxRFL4t9kXRd+S4lYhQCKtib/K34lHris26c X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznCkbT+PblrzgVa6JsNvyCFyje3g+2v8BtvwBLory2+glEbA2z0XATh2wAqabhjxlsCqMl8Q== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5ba7:: with SMTP id 7mr53051217qvq.31.1609257017497; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:50:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y187sm26441139qkc.120.2020.12.29.07.50.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:50:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 10:50:15 -0500 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: thoughts improving duplicate message handling... Message-ID: <20201229155015.w5tis6i3hr4pz3lo@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org References: <20201228214146.GB17600@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201228214146.GB17600@dcvr> List-Id: On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:41:46PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > a) There are occasionally resent revisions of patches with the > same Message-ID This is broken and is unwanted. :) > b) More often, a cross-posted message has different trailers > depending on which list it was posted to. (And the > PublicInbox::Filter::* API doesn't apply at indexing, > only at git injection time) In this case, my preferred solution is "first in wins", with ability to affect which one shows up first, using a weighting metric such as "comes first in the config file" or "has a higher priority setting." -K