From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8AE1F4B4; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:26:49 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: "extinbox" term - was: [RFC 4/7] lei: proposed command-listing... Message-ID: <20201226112649.GB6226@dcvr> References: <20201215114722.27400-1-e@80x24.org> <20201215114722.27400-5-e@80x24.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201215114722.27400-5-e@80x24.org> List-Id: Eric Wong wrote: > +'add-extinbox' => [ 'URL-OR-PATHNAME', > + 'add/set priority of a publicinbox|extindex for extra matches', > + qw(prio=i) ], > +'ls-extinbox' => [ '[FILTER]', 'list publicinbox|extindex sources', > + qw(format|f=s z local remote) ], > +'forget-extinbox' => [ '{URL-OR-PATHNAME|--prune}', > + 'exclude further results from a publicinbox|extindex', > + qw(prune) ], I'm a bit iffy on "extinbox" It's supposed to be a short version meaning "either external index or a public inbox" However, it's the same length and only two middle letters away from "extindex" (short for "external index"). Would "inboxish" be an appropriate term in place of "extinbox"? There's precedent with git using the terms "treeish" and "committish". I also don't want to force a user to specify the type, since it will support HTTP(S) URLs and not just on-filesystem storage.