From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A23C1F4B4
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 21:20:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id h19so7623539qtq.13
        for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:20:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version
         :content-disposition;
        bh=GZ4JNr93QXJte9RY5fr7zOzTR4zRCFM08Mm6lp1JkOw=;
        b=PGB+MoVB8juCZR26NEzEQSxxCBpW8XN7VGT2C9S8QjZiRkdcWoQCAT7bhiusbFOXFR
         xCqOzsZgmZJ9WZRzMd0tzKCBdIUSszdKxqIoS6BOZ3cVZuK64iBE2vUfVjLQ4D1REaOL
         LPyqIcXRzACvh7LDcXvvAmIena5MBRNVNlezk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :mime-version:content-disposition;
        bh=GZ4JNr93QXJte9RY5fr7zOzTR4zRCFM08Mm6lp1JkOw=;
        b=nof4oXnj7eULFA9p7ttNsCAxI5pnQH2uCHWRAqlnrJcu+g/6RNKXEEx5U93KAZtoMw
         pGVEXfENF2V3+508oTIU/qmtEvMPzmdfkbF8pwjT4W749WC41yzIRbwdV/wBwUZe2QBH
         mgeBz6hR48uaCDzdB1yRyWbTcvrfqpgWr3oRt1hEQL57Vay6B0nB0iw7rly+1uyCBjAS
         3JcCE89/gea7RtSWnRlUzcK5KM4ODwRnWykPTl2ZIWpCXrTtmqhr2T91tFcG6xFOjjXr
         T0tXiMa5n6vhdZAGC7YLvyRAojfWISQFmQGhrNFtHHIh6MdgUCO3lkQO/buGmFmFyXmo
         0Rmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eLkC+1UoTgvUfAp7hblcuPkDy0vGf+3HE0B88HBEvmZy+cUvk
	eiun0Df+fuQnuyD/OgTI6Ap1kpamPzCKWZuI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhnC4K9TR8GAdlOAmNUPGH0ctrssPseCiHg4uinlg1JXibNOGqEwe0hJNT8VXkUgVm6nSIHQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d4f:: with SMTP id g15mr18353419qtx.260.1608585635177;
        Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z40sm6779937qtz.81.2020.12.21.13.20.34
        for <meta@public-inbox.org>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:20:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:20:32 -0500
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: public-inbox + mlmmj best practices?
Message-ID: <20201221212032.syunaxzrvcqcrose@chatter.i7.local>
Mail-Followup-To: meta@public-inbox.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Hello:

One of our projects is looking at mailing list hosting and I was wondering if
I should steer them towards public-inbox + mlmmj as opposed to things like the
moribund googlegroups, groups.io, etc.

I know meta uses mlmmj, but there don't appear to be many docs on how things
are organized behind the scenes. Is there anything to help me figure out the
best arrangement for this setup?

-K