From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D9A1F4B4 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id y15so5097583qtv.5 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:41:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=i2InvWuuyG3oSgsXp/FelPD/EujRv51Pp1MMDbSohw0=; b=J8kUYvtY3ObiJZKCVnfCdqkjfjnHa3RHRQr07mJEhJAyrXIGv5JI7oWvUMFbalybNE 9okg7xzRcwTSXROQp5AN6B+5eipw9hkjGpd/caj4WMnx4fclPM+NQIZcfsfULmk58Siu BfQVIh/bm0SCwg20tXp5d9aLV/1i/GNujFRl8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=i2InvWuuyG3oSgsXp/FelPD/EujRv51Pp1MMDbSohw0=; b=hD3ife8Of/cZY8wcimzbZ+Eh+pq2b+a8D3vmFXjTqRQIHZazRn611Ep9ixMlPPGK8S dsMu4skVxK9L71B85DN5kfY/gEC2mFiuq07b5+pYRVc2WVRKYG51A9ApP1v1fLPh1z8x HuMj7qKQe8nFjv6MxdDO7/RDjCU5in5NU0w4gM3pTba0sPXhJY+LQ0quXB2mwZ2zh91w uAjgR/rOXu0hNYOPqUrdc8rt3gkjj5efVcSYMmmq4TZpjner9fvof5Lj2LBrIEccoLkU JPSqYP+KPnZyxAPkRqPyWU7Y3l3VtnSdrIrLPyOBlTJoxp68g5brjv0tm6QJcglhFcg4 bClw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531srO9wtfK5L0M1Uli+UjVYzyfDCY19MTFT7kPqlvatL8ywF/CH l6Wiqctkd/nH+/tBQXaf/EQJLIxE/nK9vB2G X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUsgIWmjbXJno47J1MBapcIf/en4l6fC2iMIONr98ItxOG/ZsdEg5mI5w7waQQC0UpU5hhhA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1013:: with SMTP id z19mr11537266qti.74.1607640066383; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:41:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm5098739qte.27.2020.12.10.14.41.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:41:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:41:04 -0500 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Extra newline when retrieving messages Message-ID: <20201210224104.m332w54nfcdzscpa@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org References: <20201210202145.7agtcmrtl5jec42d@chatter.i7.local> <20201210205540.GA10371@dcvr> <20201210214329.do66z6gzvepxc5w3@chatter.i7.local> <20201210223847.GA24532@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201210223847.GA24532@dcvr> List-Id: On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:38:47PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > > > That said, should public-inbox consider this case when generating the > > /raw and /t.mbox.gz messages? If the Archived-At and List-Archive > > headers are listed in the DKIM-Signature header, skip inserting them > > into the generated message? > > Fwiw, I've been wondering if they are even necessary. I don't > think anybody misses them with -imapd. So I prefer to just drop > them and have less code: Right on, I'm good with that. -K