From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17E01F4B4 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id b18so4702697qvt.10 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 06:01:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CVTllRR44suc5mVpvRLpTRmMHkCXzz7Mpl2hv9MrX9g=; b=dG/pfRnqkacwAVw0+/xnLW6GJEZCWBEtn2/xmPnVGb+oW68Q4aJrG1QwlAGqqU1w0h lTxY4+xW+NnOP5iG3s9Qo5xNVw3AAr7Smi69xR76W9GcWi06TYWcap1Pm8+5Jwyt5+sE Vs8wlBjSbfH4+CuogUYKcgDZeOR/+Iwi1HpeU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=CVTllRR44suc5mVpvRLpTRmMHkCXzz7Mpl2hv9MrX9g=; b=hulN01tby2eBIvQhI+PhRFsgQ18nyjFGr7Zc5YMqAvAn+Y9MKX/XGZpv3TDQmuxoRw /N2CWRBsYdBDt+0719pP6NWDu6vYpBgKsZ8Vl4AajUP0GMM4fXOBUVhHV49Q1QFEKkN7 GrIM3eT/tLkttFh7cgXmfcCnGxuuZJ/MbFeg53yXhDminTEzNwS9pDbW2Cqiw8AMx8kq vZz0zlcyA5hNvPSZG48+awiy0vnpOANafGZm5G82teO1AXN8Q6uhF5PnLOA9PWi5Qhee gFJTArqGJzMg3yk7F/23q7/h5zeGmHGJhtHIHZ0oowsMPBBkFV+/3jCi7i+YKJ8/zQvE vN7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ecUJSrpoigOAuKBk5z5qdLnsw3Cuhlvr0sUCc+03OLmufLNdc KZOWs7HJ3e9re/fGYlJwMJBCiQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0xfvViDD5fZGIJnfRdzGRihuxNdqS1BbBii9pLEqjSq73bFY3z+sLSUcrZuvX1s/cJTNIuQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:909:: with SMTP id dj9mr27102038qvb.31.1607436073442; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 06:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z186sm14004659qke.100.2020.12.08.06.01.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 06:01:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:01:11 -0500 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Eric Wong Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: WIP: searching all of lore Message-ID: <20201208140111.3lxecf42d6ooskeb@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Wong , workflows@vger.kernel.org, meta@public-inbox.org References: <20201126194543.GA30337@dcvr> <20201128223457.GA31347@dcvr> <20201205200717.GA7923@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201205200717.GA7923@dcvr> List-Id: On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:07:17PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Per-inbox search also uses subset search, so all the existing > inboxes should be searchable on an individual level, not just /all: > http://rskvuqcfnfizkjg6h5jvovwb3wkikzcwskf54lfpymus6mxrzw67b5ad.onion/lkml/ > http://rskvuqcfnfizkjg6h5jvovwb3wkikzcwskf54lfpymus6mxrzw67b5ad.onion/workflows/ > http://rskvuqcfnfizkjg6h5jvovwb3wkikzcwskf54lfpymus6mxrzw67b5ad.onion/netdev/ So, are things to the point where we only need a single xapian db for all lists, or do we still need to keep individual list indexes? -K