From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F59F1F66F for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id 62so16948647qkj.7 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:15:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g6zoPTCPaQVrUOs47w82OSeHtWitf6UxJ92uk8NHuMw=; b=VmhB0RXB3NJDV0fSToOqA3pktBU0sa1KgR1IQs9Nly4LKaWgxe0yhZRMyrkO0EfypN OyYm1v4nFKx5Ku73iK5YYaUArtfKyhRy8dX8qCJhVMh28ZCsPs7pL++rAdaj6WsNxGRs MZaHLYhIjQOVOXv9q6URhbcoLHlav/HuXBKuc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=g6zoPTCPaQVrUOs47w82OSeHtWitf6UxJ92uk8NHuMw=; b=ICB8xPfAWb1kWNTiV2hREKmqf+Caj/CJqDxOsCucV8L33GDEXJJb8h7AKeURinRMWY gxM/8jzLrveE0NibZuJ3krd1Q990cH1BmBzrF5RUVOZFefCCgNtVGvcF/EzzIAus+6pi AKeOolvvYz6HmTJlRc+6F5NbWdOLkXHz1r0J3OnNaNyDdWQFZ/pSKHh+d4slRTBKaEji zfE5be01iAx7oBr9QdLLxylGhFnOyQqLHLNyW92AAfBSL3GEuA2niTMBIyCKd7hPmOCe dCOd3DHo3bofx2IjQLTaFf2RXRtuSKsQtur7kldu0X0mLq1JbWXm5PFDYN5PJB/+7D+P 6P4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pKWiBXBSCzsiA/55iKZ5q4QX8+DDLzcwki32tE38AHBO+LUyD DmqqkPph28taVQF94tLyIPB1PA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVrFLewlhA6G9XPhB9rE+6lf+Zkmw4qdsUsq0qdxfiBkk2dW1RLJDP5sEBQq5mLeroCSRmhA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:102c:: with SMTP id a12mr15267728qkk.47.1597716927818; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n33sm21304312qtd.43.2020.08.17.19.15.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:15:25 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Could public-inbox do something helpful with .mailmap? Message-ID: <20200818021525.of2vnlzmab2f4fzq@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: "Eric W. Biederman" , Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org References: <87ft8k69ce.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ft8k69ce.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> List-Id: On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 08:17:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > They have an update to their preferred email address in the .mailmap > in the linux-kernel source. Is there any chance public-inbox could > look at .mailmap and do something useful in the web interface? > > Perhaps display an alternate address next to the original? > > I don't even know if that is a sensible request but I thought I would > ask before I am distracted by something else. Not sure it belongs in public-inbox, but it would certainly be an interesting feature addition to b4. -K