From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN:  
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BC41F462;
	Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:43:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:43:49 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [WIP] v2writable: support INBOX_DEBUG=replace
Message-ID: <20190611184349.GA13551@dcvr>
References: <20190609025147.24966-1-e@80x24.org>
 <20190610150647.GA16418@chatter.i7.local>
 <20190610154058.jqaawkktvb5u2itj@dcvr>
 <20190610185730.GC16418@chatter.i7.local>
 <20190610192905.55xb737jl7qnbh23@dcvr>
 <20190610194039.GD16418@chatter.i7.local>
 <20190610220320.nssvqjseswo2ujl2@dcvr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190610220320.nssvqjseswo2ujl2@dcvr>
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 07:29:05PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > > I did a few successful tests on small trial lists, but I'm running
> > > > into a
> > > > problem when I try to actually edit something in (a copy of) LKML:
> > > > 
> > > > $ perl5lib/bin/public-inbox-edit -m messageid /mnt/fastio/lkml
> > > > (mutt opens here)
> > > > 1 kept, 0 deleted.
> > > > Exception: Expected block 102325 to be level 2, not 0
> > > 
> > > That's an exception from Xapian I haven't seen that in years.
> > > Which version of Xapian and are you using chert or glass?
> > 
> > EL7 has 1.2.25.

Also, is that the Search::Xapian version or the
xapian-core-libs/libxapianXX version?  It's OK if they mismatch,
Search::Xapian (XS bindings) can work with libxapianXX for 1.4.x,
even.  Mainly it's the libxapianXX version which matters.

> Oh, I just realized that doesn't use OFD locks at all because
> its Linux 3.10 and OFD locks appeared in 3.15 (unless RH backported).

Yes, it appears RH backported OFD locks to 3.10; so more variables
to consider...

Just wondering, do t/edit.t and t/replace.t tests pass for you?