From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE7E1F453 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id n18-v6so21073564ioa.9 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=j5y6HpgxlfIBn+C4hloSf+p1ZzQ66nZJoEemy7Lh6Ac=; b=Huz0WqDVSc2cfFcDIjGkrJVlCywtOdLvNiWLc2x+Gnxism5OB3sDzB/wdJVXTIH8NQ 1N8kB7V+25reGLBiOuvIerL4dX3JCmVKdmDFL4t9QcCd9oTHawCqY4Cbd/GSzhDPIQYk L8vG9jMZM/qdOepKp7DYKmMgiv3OmJLX/ZOFQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=j5y6HpgxlfIBn+C4hloSf+p1ZzQ66nZJoEemy7Lh6Ac=; b=Bt/Ve+fs6cb2rSkAxVRXQIarqystiCdXA2xA1oHFcfV9zRJwTAMb3qChgxzxgkJ/XQ qghKj6JctD9lPgQyHpaO37fV+ZKHWdQ/OoYSrD3b7VdY2WW6qGOp89SJOsu0G/mxHs6m F6tJKDVVcx1lcjYoszx8D1zk6iKgiIQJ5smblxSsovFJHrSLXxo6QezGQtmJzGetIcra iV6rgP6Ta9+QIHWIpQ3MpOVSTVsy7rFvAecvGBmk/6Ry3+pQ2xVeBSl9WpK0IK0mft8U goIQf+9tGWoWPipe2TJC1I1zZGa8EDjLaBF+REKY3QMb19WjAr5ZcFCKH2g+D6VELWIP /PCg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoghl8P2kguj/731VDwtuBB1HmjLS+3xtyNWynquIk5u2UnpiHvz q5BRKYpJgq1qjSYkNWPr9rp0Fo/kRtPb5A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61TnY/7xIHphmdtSNhLZa19pfFisMcJFVidDWPAIt0ulHOsozJ7cD6lQ0LuVD2VAepkmb8Txw== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b281:: with SMTP id b123-v6mr1835573iof.140.1537895776102; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter ([199.66.90.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u204-v6sm1222048itb.34.2018.09.25.10.16.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:16:57 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Stripping multipart/alternative HTML parts instead of rejecting Message-ID: <20180925171657.GA2950@chatter> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, all: We've started adding other kernel-related mailing lists to=20 lore.kernel.org, not all of them mailed via vger. This raised the issue=20 of html-alternative parts, which are allowed by other mailing list=20 providers that are using mailman. Such messages are currently rejected=20 outright by public-inbox, but I'm wondering if that is perhaps too=20 strict when there are plaintext parts available? Best, -K --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQR2vl2yUnHhSB5njDW2xBzjVmSZbAUCW6ptiQAKCRC2xBzjVmSZ bIyFAQCwwTUP8H4AhmRJ8551PMhG1EyoQXKwZsPVATS67+fVSAD/S2v0tbIB4Frt F7neBniYYNlYvyPMpafr6OsVYCEqewU= =OOsU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--