From: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>, gwl-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Comments on process template syntax
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:58:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f406c4169f6e07406e5524acc6913f2460d64f48.camel@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rrdthmz.fsf@elephly.net>
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 11:20 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While looking at the examples at
> https://www.guixwl.org/beyond-started,
> I found that process templates might be difficult to understand, and
> that they have no pretty syntax.
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> process: (list-file-template filename)
> name
> string-append "list-file-"
> basename filename
> packages "gzip"
> inputs filename
> outputs
> string-append filename ".list"
> run-time
> complexity
> space 20 mebibytes
> time 30 seconds
> # { gzip --list {{inputs}} > {{outputs}} }
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The first line is easy to understand for lispers but it might look
> weird
> to people who come from other workflow languages or programming
> languages. This describes a procedure called “list-file-template”
> that
> returns a process parameterized on the argument “filename”.
>
> Nextflow has no concept of procedures that produce processes when
> given
> arguments. It does however have a concept of data streams that can
> be
> fed into processes, which results in a process to be instantiated for
> every element of the stream. The stream may be created from a
> directory
> containing files.
>
> This implementation likely stems from the realization that the
> “template
> case” is the most common case for processes. Rarely ever is it
> necessary to define a process that does *not* require
> parameterization
> on its inputs.
>
> Can we make the common case simpler and easier to understand?
Perhaps with some parentheses? That it is a Lisp is a good thing, not
something you'd rather hide.. :) Like you've said; what you've defined
above is a procedure, not a record. That's a really cool "feature" of
the GWL!
Maybe we can just clarify the feature better in the documentation.
Here's my initial thought:
---
When defining processes, they can be parameterized by turning the
process definition into a procedure, which will form a template for
processes to be defined later. This is done by adding a name for the
template, and its parameters directly after "process:".
---
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-03 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-02 10:20 Comments on process template syntax Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-02 23:30 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-03 8:08 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-03 14:22 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-03 15:23 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-03 23:16 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-04 9:55 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-05 1:48 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-05 15:14 ` zimoun
2020-02-03 8:58 ` Roel Janssen [this message]
2020-02-03 12:07 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-03 12:56 ` Roel Janssen
2020-02-03 14:33 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-04 10:10 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-05 2:12 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-05 15:21 ` zimoun
2020-02-05 15:29 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-05 15:37 ` zimoun
2020-02-05 16:02 ` Kyle Meyer
2020-02-05 16:23 ` zimoun
2020-02-05 15:07 ` zimoun
2020-02-05 18:04 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-05 19:14 ` zimoun
2020-02-05 21:32 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-06 11:59 ` zimoun
2020-02-05 14:56 ` zimoun
2020-02-08 12:34 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-02-05 14:50 ` zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.guixwl.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f406c4169f6e07406e5524acc6913f2460d64f48.camel@gnu.org \
--to=roel@gnu.org \
--cc=gwl-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).