From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8JcGEnFk5WJFbAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:03:45 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id gGP8EHFk5WKUuAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:03:45 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51122FE98 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35548 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHpsN-0005vN-Lo for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:03:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHpsI-0005tq-Mp for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:03:38 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:48891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHpsG-00007f-4E for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:03:38 -0400 Received: from kagayaki.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at [85.127.52.93]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Lw9gp2ttFz1DPy0; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:03:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4Lw9gp2ttFz1DPy0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1659200599; bh=GIFp3y5f9+QFWym8oXy17gY70m+iRvg3RQgZmT+GYrc=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qoQDQXiGABnNlPST5K9b/RY1Tu3INLLfa0QFkEq7E+TJ8LLd/n96ORcrzmwRqdjuW sfHK8geBLYW9LNZaCp0m5EIFkVGus5d87woX+dtsfFYexcENR7i1oLPMtzbvUJ+a8f yicHNg+Lukhk7gQjpudo6tpvuPBYdAEkB7uY/n7Q= Message-ID: Subject: Re: GWL 0.5 fails with plain packages From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: Olivier Dion , gwl-devel@gnu.org Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:03:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877d3w2ai5.fsf@laura> References: <18bd5afb0a09902a23e183cc26ccaf85f08009c0.camel@ist.tugraz.at> <877d3w2ai5.fsf@laura> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 Received-SPF: none client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=liliana.prikler@ist.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: gwl-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1659200625; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=GIFp3y5f9+QFWym8oXy17gY70m+iRvg3RQgZmT+GYrc=; b=eMtNxEntfG5lDC5EyqoCBwNq5OI9uolrCTABcDaXl5Ge8JwQlhlMzuLXlbrCTA+oLYuDok P86cCogzdnrfFA9lnmVPlKE9v11F4LEM8tSP8bny/+TVwqwDyAn1psZktVmYsnCcZEDUKj Wi9LtZsxJmZMOjkpEUvkrceFDmSNSLoCS7K4KRrWCfGmFMWX5wMcYgeaVsYvpBYkl++yXd uiKOYOBDo34ozlXmFXaQ+VxjKk/X5OUv24zasoRTL0wdH1BHmimndqP8rsnM0nGjCIwZIT sRcC2tYQgI1QyS9lfLLY6kmBmt0Lau2cl28zUoRdoSinEsDesX8ZwnOog2Bkaw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1659200625; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pGQSKiCkh+uc7t5TdMVDIh4BgK790L7mPbhSmL06hADkW4glsuo868/alM/IqohkjrSpdy l9RqD7FgmyRy8tGdfxxiX8bI1Wcpwy8dgV0NsBRt+u1V9D1l1lvpYbaMn0V+8kbHc9ST7I 8wbKHOX9oWEU7/FWRACeV6c7I1ZJVgeL6nzJt4mBTRqCmEWSFxyNX5Ymlc1HhQPhjufknn vOcskCObJg8eBSylLmgiTcCZI1+R5+aeTBjy1RVLWk+hDZH4tXu3mzC0t0NaARNyhY48BZ DRHWQ0P4VQb86qk9Bcj/DddAJSpsBmdCktHgedx1NcMjwzsj6yKq9hk/KprcsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=qoQDQXiG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tugraz.at; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.63 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=qoQDQXiG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tugraz.at; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A51122FE98 X-Spam-Score: -3.63 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: NyKyuEIbxkdb Am Freitag, dem 29.07.2022 um 11:40 -0400 schrieb Olivier Dion: > Please try the following patch: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > diff --git a/gwl/processes.scm b/gwl/processes.scm > index 2452d1f..4207f51 100644 > --- a/gwl/processes.scm > +++ b/gwl/processes.scm > @@ -197,12 +197,21 @@ >              ((and (? string?) spec) >               (lookup-package spec)) >              ((and (? valid-package?) pkg) > +             (set! (package-output pkg) "out") > +             pkg) > +            (((? valid-package? pkg) (? string? output)) > +             (set! (package-output pkg) output) Looking at the code for handling plain packages, that'd probably work, but it raises more questions. Like "why is package-ouput a object- property?" and "wouldn't this break if someone needed two different outputs of the same package in a process or even anywhere in the workflow?"