From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxI5m-0001Kl-6L for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:10:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxI5l-0008L0-Gg for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:10:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87pnrl40j8.fsf@elephly.net> <87y3673hoi.fsf@elephly.net> <87sgwf3gay.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: <87sgwf3gay.fsf@elephly.net> From: zimoun Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: `--run=simple` error ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Hi RIcardo, On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 18:05, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > While the GWL does depend on Guix as a library it does not directly > depend on the Guix package collection. We want that to be whatever the > user happens to use. I feel that maybe there really ought to be a > Guix library that=E2=80=99s separate from the package collection=E2=80=A6 I agree that there is something unclear with the Guix library on non full GuixSystem. >From my understanding, it is the same issue for emacs-guix, isn't it? Cheers, -- simon