From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <871rrdthmz.fsf@elephly.net> <87lfpjswla.fsf@elephly.net> <6be1d411b6caab4e91b67fd24bde5095afb65bc5.camel@gnu.org> <87k153spu3.fsf@elephly.net> <874kw6slwm.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0at129q.fsf@kyleam.com> In-Reply-To: <87d0at129q.fsf@kyleam.com> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:37:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Comments on process template syntax Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: Kyle Meyer Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , gwl-devel@gnu.org List-ID: Hi Kyle, On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 16:29, Kyle Meyer wrote: > > 1. > >> process list-file-template (with filename) > > > > 2. > >> process list-file-template > >> with filename > > > > 3. > >> process list-file-template : with filename > Those are just different ways you can write the same thing in Wisp: I agree. (aside the fact that I personally do not like the colon ':') But the macrology sugar will not expand as Wisp does, if I have understood correctly, i.e., the expansion will be > (process list-file-template (filename)) The 'with' is sugar to specify the arguments and avoid all the ambiguous examples. All the best, simon