From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5yX-0006Ug-RC for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 06:04:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5yO-0005gb-S7 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 06:04:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]:37554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5yN-0005Lh-L6 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 06:04:04 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id w47so3315407qtk.4 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 03:03:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a78a9u22.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: <87a78a9u22.fsf@elephly.net> From: zimoun Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 12:03:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How do I support building a guix package over multiple machines in a cloud environment? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org, Josh Marshall Hi Ricardo, On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 00:39, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > The GWL is capable of running jobs in a distributed environment. I > started work on an AWS library for Guile[1], which would allow us to > spawn EC2 instances as needed. The library works in that it provides a > DSL for interacting with AWS, but it needs testing, polishing, and > integration into the GWL. This is really great! Let talk about that in the near future. :-) > Currently, I=E2=80=99m on parental leave and don=E2=80=99t really get to = do any hacking > for a few months. Take care! :-) > I would be happy if someone else could take a look at > the AWS library and its integration into the GWL; these tasks are not > trivial, but there are only few unknowns and it really just requires > time to implement the missing bits. I will schedule some time to give a look at your library. If you are coming at the Guix Days, we could discussed these tasks and others. :-) Cheers, simon