From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxE04-00086h-RO for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:48:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxE03-0005yG-Tw for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:48:36 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]:45380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxE03-0005uV-NF for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:48:35 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id v139so1488902qkb.12 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:48:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87pnrl40j8.fsf@elephly.net> <20190222163314.u6657mmljjcuugeh@thebird.nl> In-Reply-To: <20190222163314.u6657mmljjcuugeh@thebird.nl> From: zimoun Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:48:23 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: `--run=simple` error ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org Hi Pjotr, On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 17:33, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > Yes, it can be hard. Best is to systematically rule out problems. > Containers are preferred by me because there is no chance of a mixup. Yes but when speaking about Guix modules, one wants the most up-to-date (i.e. from guix pull) which is not necessary the case with container (i.e. from guix package -i guix). >From my understanding, there is a real "issue" for all the packages that depends on the package guix. For example emacs-guix, gwl that I am aware of. Cheers -- simon