From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoLw-0006Bv-UX for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 10:54:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoLu-0000Sa-NU for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 10:54:24 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]:33558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoLt-0000Le-2O for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 10:54:21 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id r6so595148qkc.0 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 07:54:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87lg2atsxx.fsf@elephly.net> <87mumj0xzq.fsf@elephly.net> <87pnrez7zg.fsf@elephly.net> <87blzll7be.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: <87blzll7be.fsf@elephly.net> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:54:06 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: variable interpolation in code snippets List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org Hi Ricardo, It improves the readibilty. However, does the keyword `list` is mandatory ? I find more readable something in this flavor: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- process: foo inputs: 1 #:bar hello world procedure # bash { echo {{inputs:bar}} } --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- With the renaming scheme that I proposed: - inputs -becomes-> packages - data-inputs -becomes-> inputs - outputs -becomes-> outputs All the best, simon