From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45300)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1gyiQg-0001eG-GS
	for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:30:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1gyiQc-0002WK-R2
	for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:30:12 -0500
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]:43138)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>)
	id 1gyiQa-0002Mc-JI
	for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:30:10 -0500
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id y4so16285837qtc.10
	for <gwl-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:30:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87lg2atsxx.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAJ3okZ0_+pjQ6bt4tpAMpgr2cHf5j-am80UemWKo31MFcPUo-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87mumj0xzq.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAJ3okZ23JVVJ2sZsGq2r-Ph50aHpcfYkq1y3Fw9WDOnLhdc08A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pnrez7zg.fsf@elephly.net>
In-Reply-To: <87pnrez7zg.fsf@elephly.net>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:29:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ1e84FT1NF9R2nD5xVxzRjB6UjBWap1KOTZ4KJPZcK0rA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: variable interpolation in code snippets
List-Id: <gwl-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/gwl-devel>,
	<mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:gwl-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gwl-devel>,
	<mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "gwl-devel" <gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 20:05, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>
> Yes, I think this is pretty nice.  I=E2=80=99ll aim for something like th=
is:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> process: foo
>   data-inputs
>     named-list
>       foo =3D 1
>       bar =3D hello
>       baz =3D world
>   procedure # bash { cat {{data-inputs.foo}} {{data-inputs.bar}} }
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Haven=E2=80=99t thought much about it, but =E2=80=9Cnamed-list=E2=80=9D (=
or whatever the final
> name) would introduce a let binding or something.

Yes!
The "named-list" would be the name of the reader macro, right?
(joke: "named-list" is a better name than "xyz-list" ;-)


> (BTW: I don=E2=80=99t like that it=E2=80=99s called =E2=80=9Cdata-inputs=
=E2=80=9D. =E2=80=9Cinputs=E2=80=9D is nicer and
> fits well to =E2=80=9Coutputs=E2=80=9D.)

Agree.
It was on my list asking for (bikeshedding) changes. ;-)

>From my opinion, the change should be:
 - inputs -> packages
 - data-inputs -> inputs
 - outputs -> outputs


Cheers
--
simon