From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id ENw4A1CvHGKZXAAAgWs5BA
	(envelope-from <gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:17:36 +0100
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id yKVqO0+vHGKb/wAAauVa8A
	(envelope-from <gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:17:35 +0100
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0782BBBF
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:17:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:50010 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1nOdme-0006xm-Nd
	for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:01:40 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47526)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>)
 id 1nOdmb-0006xc-S6
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:01:37 -0500
Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f] (port=37681
 helo=mail-il1-x12f.google.com)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>)
 id 1nOdmV-00076K-Gj; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:01:37 -0500
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id c14so9658085ilm.4;
 Mon, 28 Feb 2022 03:01:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=QLXm8MHChtfAiS4Xqao45O5N/vLirlEy7MKxSU0U8P8=;
 b=Jx+RRejdExAljN6tT4k7aNmV36LRFUw437fW4qQkhtuKdh35UjbqpkmKUOToBoGUUy
 tjgKLbdnX9RLORwmZLxQ00XaB930Iz+IF6XVEembki5MUvDss5hisn6vaLN/FDm7HTxD
 FbtWrz3sso3ZbcUNXGQyYyUoooFe9/gp/GJEoHxu28txYRDEvqvi8J+lQlYu+MCYMn4g
 nXKpkSNNJzclZjDfF52ZtcwGFkfJ3fOUPE4MQiueOEUMIu8G0arHRyaP8ODCmDKOw4A7
 q+U1EYe7e/axfhlku8Y3h4tsVGH0czvkCA3HXDDwyyO6Zw4lu6+81dVVWPZNvIqiwgYP
 mxPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=QLXm8MHChtfAiS4Xqao45O5N/vLirlEy7MKxSU0U8P8=;
 b=JEyHr3I1bPbx7gy08jUgs3BE94LPfHcSpfxZmrF2QaL10P0l4toBidRRzhkL+zELfg
 /dI0IaV1ylf6CsW25qX6oZ2bveftFQMln14bq0CN2eSb5EjkTAi1M88V+3BI7aWg4jSR
 hgYxUoiXvUCQdswk47jAqt4Nf2SCao+4FLdPsH4dXTQkVa9DnN1iLYaJd9AzpsRHM7ob
 +2GctVZE9rgi8uTliGF2R1aEifgEtfMCKPIgPHNRyt7tYZMSVPNenfV1gXMAjC+bXHyV
 GLNBuFhOqwUXZGAwCAHMlQAYfm18+J3fnwg+OCJThXWA7FBOrhDuLr6LV1iYqGlPsmAS
 CGeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uXLimTHJf1YphpXUnA6gBUXy/F5w85KPpKHc+RbxCeDo9V+pr
 EmriuwTzBDoYL3qP0PMnddEyCKjCraPAZh1m0rk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYl+myzZaXsR9zlAEvJwzv7LtAxSWw2+gpyzfjg/dHvRJZqXdpi0YQGxhKU48MEspAH3aRfHybS6PLWTcOGBI=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce49:0:b0:2ba:cf5e:85fe with SMTP id
 a9-20020a92ce49000000b002bacf5e85femr17845315ilr.130.1646046089254; Mon, 28
 Feb 2022 03:01:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8735k9hqj4.fsf@dlr.de> <87bkyxboue.fsf@elephly.net>
 <87pmnd9jc7.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87v8x0uset.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87fso45hd6.fsf@elephly.net>
In-Reply-To: <87fso45hd6.fsf@elephly.net>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:01:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ1ZiBu7xR6SRE80SVH7k_1qVD+EbWWJgpNJN-Bb9aWBbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with texlive-default-updmap.cfg
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f
 (failed)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f;
 envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-il1-x12f.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: gwl-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <gwl-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/gwl-devel>,
 <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:gwl-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gwl-devel>,
 <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, Ontje.Luensdorf@dlr.de,
 gwl-devel@gnu.org
Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "gwl-devel" <gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Country: US
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1646047055;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help:
	 list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=QLXm8MHChtfAiS4Xqao45O5N/vLirlEy7MKxSU0U8P8=;
	b=Z499drFM/9I6LOAKxhN9QXAdSGUu4OBuYYzlv+06sP/zEQQu7Ex2Z5w6tmYkFqXb4Kc/fL
	PYieqzG0YEMi2UIyj9I8lOdlfkIzF4O8K4XdPgVJw/AZqxyx3NuQh3q1N/8JMekIvkvcVF
	NIP6tobCzkeJ2j+/hazl53R/qXoti/PyihQCr/UXt+sBM3pDrSBW1vM5apyIg4El1d08v6
	3YclLXEnNeMdl2l/lnw5iIew6CCWMplGblQLeFFuSMaLAkm4XDvNUjI7OuFBDBPnlScg2p
	7GZ444ykAMatxRiOSIuiDahGT+9lkX6IHZVu7QT4nTmteelIqc4DvABLpV017g==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1646047055; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=WkN8Tq/VPtGYpMaHIqCjkPzHBLfvYkT9m7DelVIbBpwDvEOuscxPel73nnUgxG4973vXam
	h32CYc0I0ZKbmPdNANHl9NQF0kF4BtAH/dTh7y6pNgpZ9PqZ3LBpj7oywvWeex6ymBkNhD
	b68+zNeXstGGGNO5pqdbHfAVPnov1Ol0gdA2mqc4z59fE9bn1gavynYv9NdSBjTdMnVvDx
	QqBr6RXi52dFM2lH1kPbnaAk90q8ihQZy4bKJ2o2eqP5Wjkg55+gfncP3dSrjFRe1JTAEz
	joNliUouXvQQ3LYs6Ww6W8fbUSGk24NwCg4XM3jsBObtaGJTOSGDI7bEirWHEQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Jx+RRejd;
	dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none);
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.40
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Jx+RRejd;
	dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none);
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gwl-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7D0782BBBF
X-Spam-Score: 5.40
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com
X-TUID: 0719cpD1v7/r

Hi,

On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 at 18:50, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

> > Not sure I understand the context well enough, but yes,
> > =E2=80=98texlive-font-maps=E2=80=99 in (guix profiles) uses packages fr=
om the host Guix,
> > not from an inferior (it cannot know that inferiors are being used).
> >
> > Does that lead it to build incorrect font maps or things like that?
>
> Worse: there=E2=80=99s a mismatch between what one Guix wants and what th=
e other
> offers.  Apparently the profile hook from the newer Guix is used, but
> the look up of texlive-default-updmap.cfg in (gnu packages tex) happens
> in the older Guix =E2=80=94 which doesn=E2=80=99t *have* that package =E2=
=80=94 and thus fails.

I do not understand all the machinery so it is probably irrelevant.

Is it not related to the recent improvements of inferiors?  And the
recent texlive-default-updmap.cfg is just what spots out the flaw.


Cheers,
simon