From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1gZjJN-00086r-C9 for mharc-gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:23:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZjJL-00086i-2j for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:23:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZjJJ-0001SW-1y for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:23:22 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZjJI-0001S5-N8 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:23:20 -0500 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:22:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87zht1rz30.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Moving GWL modules List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Roel Janssen Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org Hi Roel, I=E2=80=99m interested in moving the GWL modules to their own namespace to = avoid potential clashes with future versions of Guix. Currently, GWL modules share the =E2=80=9C(guix =E2=80=A6)=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9C(gnu =E2=80=A6)= =E2=80=9D namespaces. I think it would be clearer to move all but the scripts (which extend Guix) to =E2=80=9C(gwl =E2=80=A6)=E2=80=9D. What do you think? On a related note: I can never remember if a procedure is defined in =E2=80=9C(gnu workflows)=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9C(guix workflows)=E2=80=9D. D= o you have a mnemonic? Is this separation necessary or would it be fine to rearrange things? Thanks! -- Ricardo