From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfUqh-0006hL-JI for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:41:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfUqf-0007TI-Qh for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:41:54 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfUqe-0007Qm-B2 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:41:53 -0400 References: From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:41:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhm6srda.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: Emacs mode ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: zimoun Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org zimoun writes: > Which Emacs mode do you use to write the workflow with the WISP flavour? > The wisp one? Yes. > Around me, people mainly use RStudio to complete analyses in biology fields. > I know people using VSCode or Sublime. > > What do the people around you use to write their workflow? Most here use Snakemake and they use whatever editor they use anyway. Some use RStudio, others Sublime, yet others vim. -- Ricardo