From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39884)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iyEXe-0003db-6r
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 07:39:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iyEXd-00019z-5z
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 07:39:58 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21112)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iyEXc-00018J-Pj
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 07:39:57 -0500
References: <87zhe1s27y.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAJ3okZ3ifrzdoufrX5-YphOh+WNffdWTYE12_xEBhyFOVvMQmA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IERvIHdlIGFjdHVhbGx5IG5lZWQgYSDigJxwYWNrYWdlcw==?=
 =?UTF-8?B?4oCdIGZpZWxkPw==?=
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ3ifrzdoufrX5-YphOh+WNffdWTYE12_xEBhyFOVvMQmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 13:39:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87wo95rwml.fsf@elephly.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <gwl-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/gwl-devel>,
 <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:gwl-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gwl-devel>,
 <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "gwl-devel" <gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org


zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> Well, considering Mercurial, does it become?
>
> -8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> process: fetch-data
> [...]
>   #{mercurial}/bin/hg clone {{inputs}} {{outputs}}
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I am not sure it is more readable.
> Moreover the user has to know the path.

Yes.

> Even I am not sure to understand why you want to change, from my
> opinion, and based on my user experience, it does not matter where I
> have to provide the package name but the issue is to find the name of
> the package (and the module even if specification->package and related
> help).

Yeah, I agree.  I don=E2=80=99t *want* to change it as I think it looks cle=
arer
the way it is now.

I was just exploring that path and by the time I finished writing the
email I decided to just ask for input and not waste the description of
my thoughts :)

--
Ricardo