From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcq1-0001F7-SN for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 15:11:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcq0-0001JS-JE for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 15:11:45 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQcq0-0001Ha-2W for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 15:11:44 -0400 References: <871s14iykv.fsf@elephly.net> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 21:11:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9yc7swr.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FYI: missing image / broken link in header of https://www.guixwl.org/ List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: zimoun Cc: Malcolm Cook , gwl-devel@gnu.org zimoun writes: > Well, it appears to me a good idea to have the domain name under guix.inf= o. > However, it is confusing with http://workflow.guix.info/ ; just one > `s` of difference. Yeah, it happens to me too=E2=80=A6 Guess I should add a redirect from =E2=80=9Cworkflow=E2=80=9D to =E2=80=9Cworkflows=E2=80=9D=E2=80=A6? I just enabled HTTPS for these domains and Roel updated the DNS records for guixwl.org, so it=E2=80=99s all the same site now. > Is it the same style than the one used by other GNU projects as Emacs > or Guix ? I tried to stay close to the style used by the Guix HPC blog. It=E2=80=99s= not the default GNU style. -- Ricardo