Re: How to get started using GWL 0.2.0

[Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> I fixed the bug locally, but I want to add a few more tests for that
>>> part of the code before pushing it.
>>
>> I'd still like to play around with any (temporary) workaround you might
>> have. Would you be willing share it as a patch that I can apply locally?
>
> Oh, certainly.  The reason for the bug is that I didn’t bother testing
> workflows without any inputs.  The temporary workaround is to add an
> input, even if you aren’t using it:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> process hello-world
>   inputs "/tmp"
>   # { echo "Hello, world!" }
>
> workflow do-the-thing
>   processes hello-world
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Sorry about this!

This is now fixed in commit 6d050d9937f4a454b5e051640a8831fb5035c758.
Still working on extending the test suite…

-- 
Ricardo