From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <871rrdthmz.fsf@elephly.net> <87mua01sa1.fsf@kyleam.com>
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Comments on process template syntax
In-reply-to: <87mua01sa1.fsf@kyleam.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:08:44 +0100
Message-ID: <87o8ugrt2r.fsf@elephly.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org
List-ID: <gwl-devel.gnu.org>


Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

>> (FWIW, I intend to rename the =E2=80=9Cprocess:=E2=80=9D macro to just =
=E2=80=9Cprocess=E2=80=9D to
>> remove confusing syntactic noise, so anything about the first line may
>> be changed.)
>
> Hmm, but wouldn't that conflict with the `process' constructor defined
> in gwl/processes.scm?

Yes, that would need to be renamed as well.

--=20
Ricardo