From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org, Ontje.Luensdorf@dlr.de
Subject: Re: Problem with texlive-default-updmap.cfg
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:48:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fso45hd6.fsf@elephly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8x0uset.fsf@gnu.org>
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Hello!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>
>> The invoking Guix on the other hand should always be what the user
>> expects. It is used through (guix inferior) only.
>>
>> This error indicates to me that a *new* Guix (e.g. the invoking Guix)
>> somehow ends up accessing an *old* Guix (e.g. the library Guix). My
>> thinking is that the invoking Guix is asked to build a profile, then
>> builds the profile hook for TeX Live packages, and then somehow looks
>> *outside* of the invoking Guix for that package.
>>
>> The profile hook does perform a lazy package lookup with this:
>>
>> (define updmap.cfg
>> (module-ref (resolve-interface '(gnu packages tex))
>> 'texlive-default-updmap.cfg))
>>
>> I wonder if that ends up being evaluated outside of the inferior
>> somehow. That would be quite a bummer.
>
> Not sure I understand the context well enough, but yes,
> ‘texlive-font-maps’ in (guix profiles) uses packages from the host Guix,
> not from an inferior (it cannot know that inferiors are being used).
>
> Does that lead it to build incorrect font maps or things like that?
Worse: there’s a mismatch between what one Guix wants and what the other
offers. Apparently the profile hook from the newer Guix is used, but
the look up of texlive-default-updmap.cfg in (gnu packages tex) happens
in the older Guix — which doesn’t *have* that package — and thus fails.
> Would it help to change ‘texlive-font-maps’ to use
> ‘manifest-lookup-package’ instead to find its ‘updmap.cfg’ package?
> This is what several other hooks do, precisely to make sure they pick
> the matching package.
Maybe. I’ll see if wa can change this and if it makes a difference.
Thanks for the input!
--
Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-27 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 9:37 Problem with texlive-default-updmap.cfg Ontje.Luensdorf
2022-02-23 15:08 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-23 22:15 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-27 17:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-27 17:48 ` Ricardo Wurmus [this message]
2022-02-28 11:01 ` zimoun
2022-02-28 11:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-28 13:17 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-28 13:15 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-03-30 12:32 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-03-31 6:31 ` Ontje.Luensdorf
2022-03-31 7:31 ` Ricardo Wurmus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.guixwl.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fso45hd6.fsf@elephly.net \
--to=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=Ontje.Luensdorf@dlr.de \
--cc=gwl-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).