From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46400)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>) id 1j3lAx-0000E4-0u
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:31:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>) id 1j3lAw-0002AY-4f
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:31:22 -0500
Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:59666)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>) id 1j3lAu-00025j-G2
 for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:31:20 -0500
From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
Subject: Re: How to get started using GWL 0.2.0
In-Reply-To: <874kvpmeq2.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87blpxo7p9.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <875zg5mgzr.fsf@elephly.net>
 <874kvpmeq2.fsf@elephly.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:31:15 +0100
Message-ID: <878sl1nk0c.fsf@jlicht.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <gwl-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/gwl-devel>,
 <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:gwl-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gwl-devel>,
 <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "gwl-devel" <gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
> [...]
> I fixed the bug locally, but I want to add a few more tests for that
> part of the code before pushing it.

I'd still like to play around with any (temporary) workaround you might
have. Would you be willing share it as a patch that I can apply locally?

- Jelle