From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54543) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izMca-00039y-Br for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:29:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izMcZ-0003b0-5g for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:29:44 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([94.142.245.5]:60546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izMcY-0003Z5-Va for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:29:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:21:26 -0600 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: objections to short syntax for code snippets? Message-ID: <20200205152126.uqb4cfmw7rayhgo4@thebird.nl> References: <871rrasdsl.fsf@elephly.net> <87eev9qdcj.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eev9qdcj.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "gwl-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org It is great to see these examples! On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:10:36PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > zimoun writes: > > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > >> process run-sh > >> inputs > >> . "a" > >> . mine: "b" > >> . "c" > >> . yours: "d" > >> # { > >> echo "This is mine: {{inputs:mine}}, and this is yours: {{inputs:yours}}." > >> } > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---