From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52378)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pjotr2019@thebird.nl>) id 1gxDrG-0005YW-7C
	for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:39:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pjotr2019@thebird.nl>) id 1gxDrE-00074g-7S
	for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:39:30 -0500
Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([94.142.245.5]:44082)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pjotr2019@thebird.nl>) id 1gxDrC-00071G-7i
	for gwl-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:39:27 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:33:14 +0100
From: Pjotr Prins <pjotr2019@thebird.nl>
Message-ID: <20190222163314.u6657mmljjcuugeh@thebird.nl>
References: <CAJ3okZ1-x3cs0BULKRe1uQh8-QYVq74k2ZusET6FBCK4wHSX1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pnrl40j8.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAJ3okZ2-yi+kGXL76vkZbCM34oswcg3KGS4pD_MFQkTPguVNJA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ2-yi+kGXL76vkZbCM34oswcg3KGS4pD_MFQkTPguVNJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: `--run=simple` error ?
List-Id: <gwl-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/gwl-devel>,
	<mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:gwl-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gwl-devel>,
	<mailto:gwl-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "gwl-devel" <gwl-devel-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: gwl-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 05:22:39PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Well, if I understand well, because I am running Guix on a foreign
> distro, there is a "big dance" with the Guix modules. Somehow, it is
> similar with one emacs-guix issue on non full GuixSystem explained in
> the second part of this message

Yes, it can be hard. Best is to systematically rule out problems.
Containers are preferred by me because there is no chance of a mixup.

Pj.