* [PATCH] guix: workflow: Fix short flag for --force.
@ 2019-02-07 22:34 Kyle Meyer
2019-02-26 22:51 ` Kyle Meyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Meyer @ 2019-02-07 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwl-devel; +Cc: Kyle Meyer
* guix/scripts/workflow.scm (%options): Correct character literal for
--force's short flag.
---
guix/scripts/workflow.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/workflow.scm b/guix/scripts/workflow.scm
index c8ef183..34163ed 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/workflow.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/workflow.scm
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ (define %options
(option '(#\n "dry-run") #f #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'dry-run #t result)))
- (option '(#f "force") #f #f
+ (option '(#\f "force") #f #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'force #t result)))
(option '(#\g "graph") #t #f
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] guix: workflow: Fix short flag for --force.
2019-02-07 22:34 [PATCH] guix: workflow: Fix short flag for --force Kyle Meyer
@ 2019-02-26 22:51 ` Kyle Meyer
2019-03-02 19:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Meyer @ 2019-02-26 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwl-devel
Hello,
Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
> * guix/scripts/workflow.scm (%options): Correct character literal for
> --force's short flag.
Any objections to applying this patch? Without this change, I see
$ guix workflow -f
guix workflow: error: f: unrecognized option
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] guix: workflow: Fix short flag for --force.
2019-02-26 22:51 ` Kyle Meyer
@ 2019-03-02 19:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-03-02 20:01 ` Kyle Meyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2019-03-02 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kyle Meyer; +Cc: gwl-devel
Hi Kyle,
> Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
>
>> * guix/scripts/workflow.scm (%options): Correct character literal for
>> --force's short flag.
>
> Any objections to applying this patch? Without this change, I see
>
> $ guix workflow -f
> guix workflow: error: f: unrecognized option
Sorry, I missed this email. Thanks for the reminder and the patch!
I applied it with commit 6eb6514.
--
Ricardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] guix: workflow: Fix short flag for --force.
2019-03-02 19:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2019-03-02 20:01 ` Kyle Meyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Meyer @ 2019-03-02 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: gwl-devel
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> Hi Kyle,
>
>> Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
>>
>>> * guix/scripts/workflow.scm (%options): Correct character literal for
>>> --force's short flag.
>>
>> Any objections to applying this patch? Without this change, I see
>>
>> $ guix workflow -f
>> guix workflow: error: f: unrecognized option
>
> Sorry, I missed this email. Thanks for the reminder and the patch!
> I applied it with commit 6eb6514.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-02 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-07 22:34 [PATCH] guix: workflow: Fix short flag for --force Kyle Meyer
2019-02-26 22:51 ` Kyle Meyer
2019-03-02 19:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-03-02 20:01 ` Kyle Meyer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).