From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id ENlZCHXbkmEzFgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:13:09 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id EK4QBHXbkmFPCQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:13:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5508616261 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:13:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49340 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmkDr-0003EX-Fb for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:13:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmkDn-0003E5-2Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:13:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmkDm-0008FF-Qc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mmkDm-0003AD-Eh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#51774] [PATCH] gnu: Add font-source-code-pro. Resent-From: phodina Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51774 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: 51774@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 51774-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51774.163701437812152 (code B ref 51774); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 51774) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2021 22:12:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mmkDi-00039w-Gx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:12:58 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:20853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mmkDg-00039e-M0 for 51774@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:12:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:12:49 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1637014369; bh=ub0NOShzqLnXSt2Tn8WkTWLD06h1d73xoTPVWr9c1sw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=m3E3A/vrgxkQGxSMhCevinXjEFuwj8FJhJeZm2k5Mq9pz4NAyP8COGPQXQt+a8+d4 uegY5YQ4uSDfBwEzJ+4Nw0pw95j9JAMt/0t8PPFhV3iX5x6z6K3pj8Vlij7hZ3OHw4 pkk8PWcMI1RBFnJCqNanf8+k/2UxPZ44nKFc/cm0= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: phodina X-ACL-Warn: , phodina via Guix-patches From: phodina via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1637014388; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ub0NOShzqLnXSt2Tn8WkTWLD06h1d73xoTPVWr9c1sw=; b=VrDiovZ2y+/R2nCC8NsAfr7S+U7GBe+4bbz19woUL9pzJYJAsWtI72wQL9GlLiz38HteQL ozTRaSfY4RqnpJReGGyXtHFQvZKluYG133KNKPfg+nZ6BHMuuU8U91Y9hJ47chGUtMSqj8 G3KOirPWqHLpuL37H1wvCQ55i9vcwhrLhK2QCRnkvwYLSSmEChWoZnhr9HCCu0531kfZOZ SJieouPkD4kOG6s9LYZlrJCE5EJ2Khm+Op/1Bo9gEQVQ9sDhqItUDiemQDGA0ZAk8kZWhx /0Vs6GO8A5qRyusaJhizCZHD/GdxdI+Vuz8XA0v0Y/C8XoC9QQB9uJvgGMj0Cw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1637014388; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MJgkw5n9oYltLByw8+FPxnCywZ44JmLynnkrfJxELQjX95//UXRdaGvPNtLWkMxlK+79mR PfA5UcT3ZD7IyhEqipoF1G3QyBGRjI/FpoAazhpY17+9l5J8A+R0KG9u0A2K/8LGM3F87p cDejPuOxSusXTR2xi0BWCillkuCf61XSoXuI65IEonuv0S4lfDCWbf8dzFY22/i93GeHjG HlmnOTpqX/dLdMGHiTqkYFt7ke0YzlzBJ6uG7If4A7/U6wYRbA4Nf7H4Yqvh+vvbgjDHUB K4WLbl62a/0RsWkbojFg8/tr051MWjbG2t7nsG0g7iP2OL6aOJx2zrjlq/AKLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b="m3E3A/vr"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.34 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b="m3E3A/vr"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5508616261 X-Spam-Score: -3.34 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: jiZiF7RGYb/i Hi Liliana, > > https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-code-pro") > > > > - (commit (string-append version "R-ro/1.058R- > > > > > > > > it/1.018R-VAR")))) > > Am I allowed to ask WTF this versioning scheme is? Should we just pin > > a hash instead? Hilarious, right? I agree that a hash commit would be better suited here. > > > - (file-name (git-file-name name version)) > > > > > > - (sha256 > > > > > > - (base32 > > > > > > - "00h4v3rmxyyaxni6nywacxvjnji2g2pi0b4js1yx0g67fvrv2ga > > > > > > > > g")))) > > > > - (build-system font-build-system) > > - (synopsis "Font for coding environments") > > - (description "Font Source Code Pro is sedigned as a companion to > > > > Source > > > > +Sans.") > > This scrediption is not very scrediptive ;) Jokes aside, I'd add "[It] > > preserves the design features and vertical proportions of Source Sans, > > but alters the glyph widths so that they are uniform across all glyphs > > and weights." so that Adobe bois know what they're getting. > Thanks for the tip! > > - (home-page "https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Source+Code+Pro") > > I'm not sure whether linking to Google fonts of all places is good > > praxis. Might want to link to Github instead. FWIW the repo > > advertises this: https://adobe-fonts.github.io/source-code-pro/ > > Cheers Sure, github might be more prefereble. PS: Though at the end it comes to which is better: Google vs Microsoft ;-)