From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John Darrington via RT" Subject: Re: [bug-womb] [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:39:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zjn26cyh.fsf@gnu.org> <201401112334.s0BNY1eu029773@freefriends.org> <20140112063834.GA27714@intra> Reply-To: web-translators@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1389508759-8663-0" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2Ehu-0002Lh-3d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:39:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2Ehp-0004FI-Lv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:39:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140112063834.GA27714@intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-womb@gnu.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1389508759-8663-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 06:34:38PM -0500, Karl Berry via RT wrote: On the other hand, having translations simultaneously happening in TP and www seems like a lot of headache to me. I agree, and this is what I was alluding to in my previous emails - and in some cases the work is not only being duplicated, but triplicated --- www, TP, and independently by the packages themselves. And www translators will not, in general, be technically up to using TP. That, I find hard to believe. TP requires no technical ability, beyond editing the po files (either using a tool or a normal editor) and sending emails. It is perhaps true that the TP robot is somewhat cumbersome - a web interface to compilment the current email interface might be a good idea. But like you say, this will require cooperation between TP and whoever. Might this not be a good opportunity to work together for a solution .... ? J' -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. ------------=_1389508759-8663-0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RT-Attachment: 881181/6571360/3799434 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcg djEuNC4xMiAoR05VL0xpbnV4KQoKaUVZRUFSRUNBQVlGQWxMU09Ha0FDZ2tR aW1keG5DM29KN09qTWdDZUxadVJxbm8xN0dqcjg5R0FOUjdMOGRBNwpZeDBB bjNKYXIxaTczeUd3NVZjaHhncUhFYjF4c0g2Ugo9dG5VaAotLS0tLUVORCBQ R1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0K ------------=_1389508759-8663-0--