From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8kMJ-0000be-Vw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 05:26:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8kME-0007V7-SR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 05:26:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8kME-0007Uf-Oc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 05:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8kME-0008K7-IN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 05:26:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26868: [PATCH] gnu: python-pytest-runner: Update to 2.11.1. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: References: <87fugcbnn2.fsf@gnu.org> <56d0fabaf4d350c4ab42d1a9024fb49f@lepiller.eu> From: Roel Janssen In-reply-to: <56d0fabaf4d350c4ab42d1a9024fb49f@lepiller.eu> Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 11:24:51 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: julien lepiller Cc: 26868-done@debbugs.gnu.org julien lepiller writes: > Le 2017-05-10 23:15, Marius Bakke a écrit: >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> From 33ba51e99c62243905cb88466eb5bfea557aaf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Roel Janssen >>> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 19:53:45 +0200 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-pytest-runner: Update to 2.11.1. >> >> [...] >> >>> When attempting to add another package (python-maildir-deduplicate), >>> I needed to upgrade this one. Since I'm not sure about the impact of >>> this update, I'd like to have an opinion on whether this can go in >>> as-is, or that more care should be taken. >> >> The impact of a package change can be determined with `guix refresh`: >> >> $ guix refresh -l python{,2}-pytest-runner >> Building the following 38 packages would ensure 113 dependent packages >> are rebuilt: [...] >> >> Since there are "only" 138 rebuilds it should be good for 'master'. >> It's >> good to try and build some/most of the dependent packages to check for >> any obvious breakage before such version jumps; but this seems fairly >> safe to me. > > Actually, I was about to push that this evening as part of my pootle > patch series [1]. I've already tested rebuilding all dependent packages > of the python- and python2 variants, and there is no new failure. The > only difference being that your commit comment does not reference > python2-pytest-runner, I think you can push your patch before mine if > you want, or wait for me to push my patch series. > > [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26613 Oh great! I'll wait for your patch series. Thanks for the great work! Kind regards, Roel Janssen