From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Hinsen Subject: Re: Towards reproducibly Jupyter notebooks with Guix-Jupyter Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:45:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lftt57ux.fsf@inria.fr> <87imowwt3i.fsf@gnu.org> <875zkru70u.fsf@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJyna-0002pt-L3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:46:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJynZ-00008G-Bw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:46:02 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:57063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJynY-00005L-H6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:46:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875zkru70u.fsf@inria.fr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix Devel Hi Ludo, > (Though printing addresses in a REPL isn=E2=80=99t =E2=80=9Cbad practice= =E2=80=9D IMO, it=E2=80=99s just > that it doesn=E2=80=99t mesh well with the intended use of notebooks.) And that's exactly the difference between a REPL and a reproducible document. Unfortunately, Jupyter tries to be both and thus never explains the differences clearly. > At the API level, there=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98inferior-for-channels=E2=80=99= which does that + > registers a GC root + maintains a cache so that the second time you use > a given instance of Guix it=E2=80=99s immediately available. Just what I need... > Now, I think you can safely use it in your code, I don=E2=80=99t foresee = any > significant change at this point. > > As to whether you=E2=80=99d want to talk about it in the MOOC for instanc= e, you Certainly not. I just want to be sure that the functionality won't go away. If the API changes a bit, that can be fixed. I'll start playing with this... Cheers, Konrad.