From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oPSOHfXtyV/eWgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:06:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eP9LGfXtyV92dwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:06:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F0694021E for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl66U-0003tS-8p for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:06:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl66M-0003tK-W5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:06:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl66M-0004dR-Nz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:06:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl66M-0007k7-Hd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26981: Bug report follow up Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26981 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Robert Smith , 26981@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26981-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26981.160706916029755 (code B ref 26981); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 26981) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 08:06:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl66K-0007jr-82 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:06:00 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl66H-0007jc-OR for 26981@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:05:58 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852635C0210; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:05:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:05:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.net; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=IZwQek6t1q/mdhBSWxt+//RHLb hZS07fd/LIz2IEWFI=; b=AgroLfIEJtOY8BYgApX8tHcv4fUxyWxjS53mGTcc81 dBap/Wx4NeM1LoZxcMXyKo3nvqX9aPSeY/WOmD+a5ijgew1ADElgj7+OMcVazHTF a01lj+W0Obfc6Ra40/p3JEDVRlp9bNsxvEeWTffuMZriJpA8RVn0C3g1JsHxL80j YwHXYRZLiNdnAPU9qypH7aB5SlhB9DW+43cfBfK5TFxsgM50NkOSKeOeSVwY9rVW iy8DMdgoZYZjuAY8mNWEOyGJmtYT9e7uQutdSF9Wez2KCRuJl6JJXMv7kkTFYcYy V6hhnZtCkTUQswzJyb3S/ZY0Ycr6W0ewcgrMAavIhEBw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=IZwQek 6t1q/mdhBSWxt+//RHLbhZS07fd/LIz2IEWFI=; b=HekMlIGRHddLNW8EjZUrfc BbHPFwnUwc8qxIDXAJB3MXMKRemOuWql9+vzJJmOYaHARZIOiiiSxEbqk26KUTDq /JtTXPLnLPJ9IklQHLVMmREOso9NDwAQunEsSsfEZdN6GwDjWUe6qZYdEXOF4Drl jOGoYkiXMAl7dKPNvb5Wlar+bBUahlYbpMzAcxwE6WoimP527G8rlq2fHZo54wIB VjTZ6Ryt4zC7dC3vuDahhbW14gtISPswEl52qnFABMJNuA0UYaaD5b/40VKoLAwd e0vxgoHnvS2L/ugvdWCeRqIQoGls4FEnZNnEOnSASFnhttNvO4536RXq/+6xO/Ww == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeijedguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefmohhnrhgr ugcujfhinhhsvghnuceokhhonhhrrggurdhhihhnshgvnhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhnvg htqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegleelffduueeigeetudeiffdtleeukeelgeeiieef tddvueegueejvdefjeegheenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepledtrd elvddruddvjedrudejieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgr ihhlfhhrohhmpehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhinhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home (lfbn-idf2-1-1057-176.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.127.176]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 92D85240059; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:05:51 -0500 (EST) From: Konrad Hinsen In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:05:49 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.19 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=fastmail.net header.s=fm2 header.b=AgroLfIE; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=HekMlIGR; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 99F0694021E X-Spam-Score: -1.19 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: zt2n4RTnjtqC Hi Robert, >> > The bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26981 >> > If I don't hear back I'll assume it's safe to close this. >> >> Yes, it is. Thanks for doing a cleanup! > > This bug report is still relevant? Or are you saying that it is fixed? > Sorry if my email was a bit ambiguous! Right. My full answer is "Yes, it is safe to close this." Konra.d