From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emOzq-0005tv-Do for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:15:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emOzn-00017x-7N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:15:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emOzn-00017l-0T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:15:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emOzm-0004uN-CP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:15:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30410] closed (Re: [bug#30410] [PATCH 2/2] doc: Document the --manifest option for guix pack.) Resent-Message-ID: From: Konrad Hinsen In-Reply-To: References: <878tbu9vr3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:14:48 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 30410@debbugs.gnu.org help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) writes: > On second thought, I wonder if we should allow both -m and a list of > packages. After all, =E2=80=98guix package=E2=80=99 supports it, and it = doesn=E2=80=99t cost us > anything. WDYT? Personally I don't have a use case for that, which is why I didn't bother. But it may indeed be simpler to implement this than to explain that it's not. Konrad.