From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4AatByC9m2UTKQEAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:15:12 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0L2sASC9m2UmkQAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:15:12 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fastmail.net header.s=fm2 header.b=gDXN0LP2; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=d5tZh0jf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704705311; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=dAe76mFCxlqSPgvY+A5gXgX0pXFlXvyh6L9AVqfd/w4=; b=mTnvWwS1ptdP71spkj3sbTMoStKiBNUrLQCDhXVYz+KiRw4JHR2n9YHx+4qn/r1YO3Rj7m 6GVQhCsRlNeL7J2l9+1Xt3uxe09hnZGPLH3Jg5TxOoXJUSMGyHBPB80fDAxSc2EBQO3KLZ mqWy9J/k6Zh92mQZ2ZLxOvPNLewn/LmcRb0a3vymlIjDsMGc5d+mj2n5hBNZHM2vkX44kk x/KVqkNA6OxKkUVZfpoCgnlkCLKJWoRyuIRoHTeEuALSycYgad4idfSj0ogbHwp1PIfC9v vyrnhkAgQ31CHJAsKOR2CgyVfqeUJZf7ClbOW9NVsNkurdMBBXGRKn756p6XJA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704705311; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jyRG+i/p6IlUh36gEuU8u4Qkry9jh+2jdPj8DKpxjaU0aSdghXgcobkUoyc+cabbqf3q3D RUWglfUzLVL5RXtq/FNy1fIBD2lMV+mOuVzwKu1FQU6XpVRJwslxil9Tzk98K5rOrBjMQ+ a3r8C8gRQ9kNqIGvdPIZRLhWPuoUcsl1Y2BVgXnuUDKv+WcikxP6lFhCxhpRaS92GiBJr4 rRup24I0woV7KcUaBuT4QDKfhnnjMzhUE4wj2ilkJ/gCGdM5MvKcHh2CMTt8wWLTKqt+WF Q9kSHT8H1ebt7ybmSoCLcHwNH712e5gzwBjpruVJ7nx3u0p+jRsi6T487FgUnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fastmail.net header.s=fm2 header.b=gDXN0LP2; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=d5tZh0jf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.net (policy=none) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9FEF1C2B8 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:15:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMlil-0000xR-4i; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:14:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMlii-0000ve-Q1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:14:56 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMlii-0002he-7n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:14:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMlio-0003WM-9u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#68241] [PATCH] gnu: python: Fix sitecustomize.py Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68241 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Josselin Poiret , 68241@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 68241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68241.170470527413481 (code B ref 68241); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 68241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2024 09:14:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMliM-0003VN-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:14:34 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:59927) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rMliJ-0003V6-IP for 68241@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:14:33 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB6F3201110; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 04:14:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:14:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.net; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1704705258; x=1704791658; bh=dAe76mFCxl qSPgvY+A5gXgX0pXFlXvyh6L9AVqfd/w4=; b=gDXN0LP2iofHT19TxmRNMzF7KT LmC9pNYgWqZy1ZrXG7NxvGlUaXJI9hOXxiDqVXPDFuDsdCsk0f+/L1W+AgRut830 ObXomYrLNSWJvKuiwqJ2enpPHPIGfrKqzl0PHG3YkDsxzpC8K3XmxVcK8PMObXcs vGhl8LbJv4JSLv6HuntahPUlZFVRei/LRoL+I+aqlz5ZBxtjNWtFiSQUlNaaKb52 hGuZq9ktLdVg5HotUFuRByamY8Tud6XLFBJuscEHyiuekd0DXzqUD4XyG5V6pCT4 8moFx1Qp6hWg59KFQNlXTQGZA4sITNqmgJnIeslyf3HfYUCZ4uWZzNDpLkag== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1704705258; x=1704791658; bh=dAe76mFCxlqSPgvY+A5gXgX0pXFl Xvyh6L9AVqfd/w4=; b=d5tZh0jfJum4DFaijhHHE7MUKXd5YBnExojYasZJU4k4 dK3MjTIQZQRmVqcl3/chjdT7Q1cXr3UJvMq0N3ke491P3SvcUomHOQmCqRaLbQWT XSqpyw0DaPIWGMUFpqO90DQJSKrCTVCZKG7ThXk5WkgHA33bZQfFgd89BX8nK2AL gcBBJHHdAMZPkLTl8qS8XxKZafwvkDofwqHQgAdkIrgSqz5FvVMG/O4nWsbPqtnQ Syd9iYmPlLS2n0dP8okA+SgVYj958lb3WaflALrToS3E7/U48GAlxznbUFLBUjcv jrjS7cvlc2P0Rlk6gRmR1keiHGfr8Ab0QMJ0sdSGvw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdehjedgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefmohhnrhgr ugcujfhinhhsvghnuceokhhonhhrrggurdhhihhnshgvnhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhnvg htqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffgefffefgveejkeduveekudffffduleelgfegtdeu feejleefjedthfeiffeiveenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhinhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i184641e2:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 04:14:17 -0500 (EST) From: Konrad Hinsen In-Reply-To: <87o7dw6w3w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7dw6w3w.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:14:14 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.34 X-Spam-Score: -2.34 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D9FEF1C2B8 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: 4NdDhpLVLjBM Hi Ludo, > Also, do I get it right that the patch you sent fixes more than #53258? #53258 is two things: a weird error message, and a failure to run valid Python code, the two being possibly related. My patch fixes the error message. The Python example that Marek gave already works fine in today's Guix, so it was probably fixed by something else as a side effect. Could the bug that causes the error message also mess up valid Python code? In theory, yes, but I don't have an example at hand. Cheers, Konrad.