From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:39:42 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20191009065352.GU8197@protected.rcdrun.com> <1c9dc59c-0594-6921-73e8-b173e558b5c3@vapaa.xyz> <20191010023714.GK20430@protected.rcdrun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20191010023714.GK20430@protected.rcdrun.com> (Jean Louis's message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:37:14 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Jean Louis Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, gnu-system-discuss@gnu.org, Alexander Vdolainen , help-guix@gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jean Louis wrote: > * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]: > - and then within that group there is now a hostile takeover group of peo= ple starting with Ludovic Court=C3=A8s and his "fellows" where none of them= could answer my email to provide me with the facts about their statement. = They are behaving against established implicit and explicit GNU guidelines,= and so far nobody from FSF is enforcing any policy against them. They are = danger to GNU project. > > My solution would be radical and simple: ask them to refrain damaging GNU= project, or fork their software, and expell them from GNU project. > > AS SIMPLE AS THAT. Wow! Ease off a bit! You might not noticed that, but today Guix is the most vivid part of GNU. = And I could not image an action, that might cause more damage to GNU projec= t, than urging Guix lead developers to leave. Even if you believe that for= king software over political discord is good thing to do (despite it does n= ot align well with the rest of your message), by all means, you would not a= ble to outcompete them, so it would simply ended in Guix out of GNU. So it= even more harmful than urging RMS to leave. After all, RMS is mortal and,= alas, will leave us and GNU sooner or later, while Guix is not necessary. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1yoTx9fONarixgNIydoJ3hnBsjAFAl2fGH4ACgkQydoJ3hnB sjBNvQf7BPp705k5cCkaLeHLFC4WhGU1+sigGNui4bKeMzNlcXiCZ8PLngeRPRXp WxqyaV5/q/joc125Ij+CJn0+heaojFbpC9glXhadvF0ziHP5mBLHd9ujexNA2ukz 6ze4G9AzwmVo7qMxJFmVXTjBwFAcRvFARhgch2I7j/PwkCNFCMeRK/FicjycIdI9 5liovqyXgU5teAkhiHOrFC4NIcdBLwAhsQyosnjvEaIFOYOrO1P0IVl42Mr3nK2Q 5JsxZwBLDICPYGR55uaAMTHMUaj95wGsi2zjTBT3JLIlAhzQVQ/e4P8YC2j+Uh14 jifLlb2Fsvh8JTlOce16rLs1Dc1cwg== =61NC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--