From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id OG9tE2sSG2YPHgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:16:59 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id OG9tE2sSG2YPHgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:16:59 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=iro.umontreal.ca header.s=mail header.b=GkyfLQnU; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=iro.umontreal.ca; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1713050219; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=U+hTo7Ar5E5Y2BarPN5Er1vNqTVI+dKfDqtWiRJy/uk=; b=ck1fd9Fk5pGKrzsBZjh2xIdzO55pNlTyX562+sMHDIT3FhEbvywL50R1tRHboIEisVqb5l L38OlheDNY07wkRituGh5yzv9wzcTvjhLrr1+U6h9r7hhJnWwh+92GYePrn6V1Q651NfWE TBYLxcJRxGBaSWoHZjAA8uSxYNxMW/mVoo1XAiu9SeSLX8rxoKgCbFBDXLDClay8p88dPo gKjOK1efqZPwdqUqsH3cONV8iZxyT7moQbhXMdaLwvoLCspL0OvRBGh+l3BmYJ2f5RwoeL FwDSoR9Eymal3+Ns7zgTzCS1uplRMbKZf5klYfCCOpy81ufWg0mVTh+1y7+TOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=iro.umontreal.ca header.s=mail header.b=GkyfLQnU; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=iro.umontreal.ca; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1713050219; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=S8wYMssXkUEUC19UeGVfdGK2lIVyP+Dj3jzZ7wOQfyFK68Edkr6M5cBTr2ROhCsadJht/P uarvxxVS/IIvOhVvx0N0MUEOVT0iD8ofkF1kmcZxnMIi1pFXwpde0mVHnqu8jcKVcDOKiQ h8si07r2KWSpJSAEk0TA0+ATUmooVTTG1aHVmmEzLeqKdJBjLhfQIvXpXnXCiT7exHnBrZ Fg9mwUXboOG2utF+Q6/GRXBwNuoVfYYWStK0Z/OMcdT+YaV5xemgLvF5L7gByfYsdHdOwZ FtP+Bbjq0VgBjQKVFmixVRGHPVRI7TdHpSxS2GAn0HiV6V4bcisxA+TTboBYBg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3F81C63 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:16:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvmbi-0001mL-C7; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 19:16:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvf7j-0000ae-Bh; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:16:59 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvf7h-0002Wy-8x; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:16:59 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9E04510005D; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:16:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1713021413; bh=itAm3HBFTucXZIMFg+UI1v0yRDVZRGcBRsHMgEYuYVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=GkyfLQnUMkjTUPas8ZkgjY2VTHpeln+OLa3k4PkDamsaaI3yeI4lPPxuPEc0Hmd3f dBDZyUqwBHNCuFN1yM9EMZTDCH2d1Mv3758PYtLqC6NUzNDOOsgHd7+J3y8fyPJzlN XaRi38vqNKGRl6kPCfRMKV/nihoFgz4FmV/RXPZCbxZKmNuEg/77oE6LfwD6CQO9DZ Tq5LGEC8j9OJwKeVeZMRSQbGAxRQbwzYjrmuu11hoXNrOws+HXoSGoIiyacPSsqpim qeBWyxU6lY6OrQ6zdOJ33NfO7AFDAdB+VD7r2pnG+aSjIfrVDAC7nKf+Kwf0pf+wMs 43MF/SwDkET7g== Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A82C8100046; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:16:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.201.215]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 642BE120099; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:16:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Nicolas Graves Cc: Ludovic =?windows-1252?Q?Court=E8s?= , "Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andrew Tropin Subject: Re: [Nicolas Graves] [PATCH v6 01/10] rde: emacs: Start emacs in --daemon mode, with shepherd and pid-file In-Reply-To: <87frvp4a4u.fsf@ngraves.fr> (Nicolas Graves's message of "Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:20:33 +0200") Message-ID: References: <20240410234923.29319-2-ngraves@ngraves.fr> <875xwotg35.fsf@trop.in> <87zfu0m9ps.fsf@ngraves.fr> <87jzl22u5w.fsf@gnu.org> <87frvp4a4u.fsf@ngraves.fr> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:16:52 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 19:16:24 -0400 X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.18 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -10.18 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F3F81C63 X-TUID: 3+o4yeNTeYNC > Maybe some feedback on the Emacs side about this? There are indeed very > few places where systemd sd_* functions are called in emacs.c, should we > try and re-implement them instead of using the library as is? Would that > be a contribution Emacs devs would be interested in? That would > definitely be beneficial for Emacs on Guix as highlighted by Ludo'. It's hard to tell without seeing the actual patch. But if the code is sufficiently simple, it implements a protocol that's well documented, and it allows us to eliminate the dependency on the systemd library, we might like it. Stefan