From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add CUPS. Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:48:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874ms5qlya.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Apf-00046t-4c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:48:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8ApW-0001Rd-J0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:48:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874ms5qlya.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> There are a couple of problems with this package, one of which is that >> the test suite is failing for some reason. I have not been able to >> figure out why the "cupsFileFind" test fails, so I disabled the tests. > > OK. Do you have any more details from the test suite log? I looked at this again and suddenly figured out what went wrong (hardcoded search path for "cat" in a call to "cupsFileFind"). The tests take a good while longer now and there are seven more failures that I will work on before resubmitting an updated patch. > The reason for splitting would be if it turns out that the include > directory takes a fair amount of space that is not needed in many > cases. If that=E2=80=99s the case, then splitting makes sense. That m= ay well > be the case: what=E2=80=99s the side of each of these outputs? I see that splitting would not be required in this case; the outputs are very small (6+MB for "out" and 240+kB for "include"). >> + (license license:gpl2+))) > > Isn=E2=80=99t it GPLv2-only? You are right (I was so sure I checked this). I'll fix this in the updated patch. Best, Ricardo