From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Update pardre source hash. Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20161208131215.1205-1-donttrustben@gmail.com> <8760muzgm2.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEzYF-0006aO-Mn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 09:20:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEzYB-00079d-7u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 09:19:59 -0500 Received: from sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.23]:40647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEzYB-00078L-1c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 09:19:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Ben Woodcroft writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems that the pardre source has been updated in place. I'm not sure what >>> the procedure is for verifying that nothing untoward has taken place, since I >>> cannot download and old version from the hydra content addressed mirror - >>> it does not seem to exist there either. >> >> "diffoscope" has native support for tarballs and can quickly point out >> any differences. Perhaps Ricardo has a copy at the MDC? > > I do! I still have a copy of > /gnu/store/xp2yzil11yk9askvpp56a8jjqynqb12k-ParDRe-rel1.1.5.tar.gz > > The diff looks very familiar. Could it be that this has happened > before? Or maybe I noticed the changed hash before and forgot to submit > an update...? In fact, Leo informed me about this in July, but it seems that both of us forgot to follow up on this. Thanks, Ben, for catching it! ~~ Ricardo