From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Disable DYNAMIC_ARCH on MIPS.
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:55:35 +0200
Message-ID: <idjlhgjihu0.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
References: <idjoalgirhs.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87a8x0mc0r.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45130)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1Yv2bE-0006aO-DM
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:55:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1Yv2bA-0006xO-Bw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:55:48 -0400
Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:37977)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1Yv2bA-0006x7-20
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:55:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8x0mc0r.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Mark H Weaver writes:

>> -             "DYNAMIC_ARCH=1")
>> +             ;; Unfortunately, this is not supported on MIPS.
>> +             ,@(if (string-prefix? "mips" (%current-system))
>> +                   (list)
>> +                   (list "DYNAMIC_ARCH=1")))
>
> It would be marginally preferable to use '() and '("DYNAMIC_ARCH=1")
> here.  Anyway, okay to push!

I pushed it with the suggested change.
Thanks!

~~ Ricardo