From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Plan for 0.9.0 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:27:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87io6b943m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm1UU-0000MP-Eo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:27:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm1UO-0005eT-HB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:27:50 -0400 Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:52847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm1UO-0005eA-7e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:27:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel , Daniel Pimentel Alex Vong writes: > Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all > the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper > way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d ". Perhaps we should > change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to > "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable? I think this is not a bad idea. It would also make =E2=80=9Cguix gc=E2=80= =9D behave more like the other sub-commands (i.e. require an argument). It=E2=80=99s not a command that=E2=80=99s used so often that the addition= al argument would hurt much, in my opinion. ~~ Ricardo