From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add bits. Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:05:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160629143617.28293-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <20160629161318.GA26660@jasmine> <877fd7iz79.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKQ3E-0007Ny-4w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 09:06:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKQ39-0000ZZ-0p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 09:06:08 -0400 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:55361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKQ38-0000Y0-Mi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 09:06:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877fd7iz79.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:36:17PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bits): New variable. >> >>> + (arguments >>> + `(#:tests? #f ;no tests included >> >> How about the tests described in the README? >> >> https://github.com/arq5x/bits >> >> "Now, you can test both the sequential and CUDA versions of the tools = by >> running the bits_tests scripts. Also, this shell script demonstrates h= ow >> to run each of the BITS tools" > > Good idea, I=E2=80=99ll do that. On second thought: I=E2=80=99d rather not. The script doesn=E2=80=99t pe= rform any tests, it doesn=E2=80=99t compare the output to expected values, so I thi= nk it doesn=E2=80=99t really make sense to run it during the check phase. I=E2=80=99ll push this as is. Thanks for checking! ~~ Ricardo