From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: hiawatha package description
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:51:09 +0100
Message-ID: <idj8toe1xea.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
References: <20170306123540.rqlyudjrsn3luamr@abyayala>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38990)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1clwbM-00086p-C4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:51:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1clwbJ-0002Yh-8k
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:51:24 -0500
Received: from sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.24]:60688)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>)
	id 1clwbI-0002Xh-Th
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:51:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170306123540.rqlyudjrsn3luamr@abyayala>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I'm not very happy with the description and synopsis I initially
> provided. Any ideas what could be fixed? I'll comment on what I think i=
s
> bad: [=E2=80=A6]

Could you please send a patch to update the description?

--=20
Ricardo